The Response of Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) to The Types and Application Time of Agroprobiotic Fertilizer

Alvera Prihatini Dewi Nazari, Eliyani Eliyani, Wilujeng Astutik

Abstract


The Response of Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) to The Types and Application Time of Agroprobiotic Fertilizer. Agroprobiotic fertilizer as an alternative of organic fertilizer is expected to reduce the use of chemical fertilizers.  The aim of the study was to determine:  (1) the best type of agroprobiotic fertilizer; (2) the best application time; (3) interaction between the two factors on the growth and yield of lettuce. The study was conducted from May until July 2018 at  Faculty of Agriculture, Mulawarman University.  The research was 5x2 factorial experiment arranged in Completely Randomized Design with six time replications.  The first factor was the types of agroprobiotic fertilizer, namely: Maknyus; Cimelati; Mayas Putih; Keriting; and Hitam rice. The second factor was the application time of fertilizer, consisted of: in the morning (at 07.00-08.00) and in the afternoon (at 17.00-18.00).  The variables observed consisted of: the increment of plant height and number of leaves increment at 14; 28; 42 days after treatment (DAT); and at harvest time, fresh weight, and leaves area. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance and continued with the Least Significant Difference (LSD) test at 5% level. The results showed that the types of agroprobiotic fertilizer and the interaction between the two factors had no significantly different on the growth and yield of lettuce.  Agroprobiotic fertilizer from Mayas Putih rice showed the better growth and yield than others. The best time for application of fertilizer was in the morning, it showed significantly different on the increment of plant height at harvest time.


Keywords


Agroprobiotic Fertilizer, Application Time, Lettuce

Full Text:

DOC PDF

References


Bidwell, R.G.S. 1974. Plant Physiology. Mc Milan Publishing Co Inc, London.

Cahyono, B. 2014.Teknik Budidaya Daya dan Analisis Usaha Tani Selada. Aneka Ilmu, Semarang.

Eliyani, Susylowati, Nazari, Alvera Prihatini Dewi. 2017. Pemanfaatan limbah rumah tangga sebagai pupuk organik cair pada tanaman bawang merah (Allum cepa var.ascalonicum (L) Back). Laporan Penelitian Hibah Fakultas Pertanian. UniversitasMulawarman, Samarinda.

Gardner, E.J., Pearce,R.B., danMitchell, R.L. 1991. Fisiologi Tanaman Budidaya. Diterjemahkan oleh: Susilo, Herawati. Universitas Indonesia Press, Jakarta.

Gomez,K.A.dan Gomez,A.A. 1995.Prosedur Statistik untuk Penelitian Pertanian. Edisi Kedua. Diterjemahkan oleh:Syamsuddin, E. dan Baharsyah, Justika S. UI–Press, Jakarta.

Hakim, Nurhayati, Nyakpa,M.Y., Lubis, A.M., Nugroho,S.G., Diha,M.A., Hong, G.B., dan Bailey,H.H. 1986.Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Tanah. Universitas Lampung, Lampung.

Hardjowigeno,S. 2007. Ilmu Tanah. Akademika Presindo, Jakarta.

Haryanto,R. 2005. Antara Antibiotik, Probiotik dan Prebiotik. Asisten Laboratorium Basic Science Center ITB, Bandung.

Maidin, N.B. 2002.Pengaruh Dosis dan Waktu Aplikasi Pupuk Pelengkap Cair Bioton pada Tumpangsari Kedelai (Glcine max (L.)Merril) terhadap Pertumbuhan dan Produksi Setaria Gajah (Setaria splendida Stapf). Skripsi. Jurusan Budidaya Pertanian. Fakultas Pertanian Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Mastar, S. dan Kusnayadi, H.Kualitas Kompos Berbahan Baku Lokal yang Diaplikasikan dengan Substrat Mikroorganisme Lokal (MOL). Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian 9.1 (2016): 101-112.

Nyakpa, M.Y., Lubis, A.M., Pulung, M.A., Amrah A.G., Munawar, A., Hong, G.B. dan Hakim, Nurhayati. 1988. Kesuburan Tanah. Universitas Lampung, Lampung.

Peraturan Menteri Pertanian. 2011. Pupuk Organik, Pupuk Hayati dan Pembenah Tanah. Menteri Pertanian. 88 hal

Pharmawati, M, Defiani, M.R., Arpiwi, N.L. Ca2+Intraseluler terlibat dalam Mekanisme Pembukaan Stomata akibat Pengaruh Auxin.Jurnal Biologi 12.1 (2008): 19.

Prasetya, B. Mekanisme dan Efektivitas Penyerapan Pupuk melalui Daun.Agritek 17.5 (2011): 1022-1029.

Salisbury, F.B. dan Ross, C.W. 1995. Fisiologi Tumbuhan. Jilid Tiga Edisi Keempat. Diterjemahkan oleh: Lukman, Diah R. dan Sumaryono.ITB-Press, Bandung.

Sarief,E.S. 1986. Kesuburan dan Pemupukan Tanah Pertanian. Pustaka Buana, Bandung.

Singh, K., Kallali, B., Kumar, A. dan Thaker, V. 2011. Probiotics: A review. AsianPacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine.S287-S290.

Steel, R.G.D. dan Torrie, J.H. 1993.Prinsip dan Prosedur Statistika. Suatu Pendekatan Biometrik Edisi Kedua. Diterjemahkan oleh: Sumantri, B. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.

Suhesy, S. dan Andriani.Pengaruh Probiotik dan Trichoderma terhadap Hara Pupuk Kandang yang Berasal dari Feses Sapi dan Kambing. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Peternakan. 17.2 (2014): 45-53.

Utaminingsih, E. 2013.Pemanfaatan Limbah Biogas dengan Penambahan Limbah Buah, Air Leri dan Urine Sapi terhadap Pertumbuhan Tanaman Mentimun (Cucumis sativus L.). FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Surakarta.

Wareing, P.F. dan Philips, I.D.J. Growth and Differentation in Plant. Pergamon Press. Amer. Soc. Hort.Sci. 108.6 (1981): 948-953.

Widyastuti, E. 2011.Teknologi Pengolahan Hewani Probiotik dan Prebiotik. Ilmu dan Teknologi Pangan. Universitas Brawijaya, Malang.

Wulandari, C.G.M, Muhartini, S. dan Trisnowati, S. Pengaruh Air Cucian Beras Merah dan Beras Putih terhadap Pertumbuhan dan Hasil Selada (Lactuca sativa L.). Jurnal Vegetalica. 1.2 (2012): 24-35.

Yunenshi, Febria. 2011. Pengaruh Pemberian Probiotik Pediococcus pentosaceus Asal Fermentasi Kakao Hibrid terhadap Penurunan Kolesterol Telur Itik Pitalah. Tesis. Program Pascasarjana. Universitas Andalas, Padang.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31293/af.v18i1.4104

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Agrifor (Budidaya Agronomi dan Kehutanan) ISSN ONLINE APRIL 2016 : 2503-4960