PEMILIHAN MODA TRANSPORTASI PELAJAR SEKOLAH DI KAWASAN K.H. AHMAD DAHLAN SAMARINDA

EDI SANTOSO

Abstract


Activity studying in school will lead to a journey that can produce movements that ultimately require a choice of modes of transportation. The selection of modes to school students in the K.H. road area Ahmad Dahlan is not a random process, but is influenced by many factors. The problem is, what factors influence the learner in choosing the mode of transportation to the school and the mode of transportation that many students choose.

                The survey was conducted by spreading 342 questioners on students of SMPN 2, MTS. Normal Islam, SMKN 4, SMPN 37 on the road  K.H. Ahmad Dahlan Samarinda. The survey results were analyzed by Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to determine the mode selection factors.

                The analysis shows that the factors that affect school students in the area K.H. Ahmad Dahlan Samarinda in choosing the mode of transportation to school is a safety factor (33.654%), cost factor (23.316%), comfort factor (21.429%), time (19.601%).

                For many transportation modes in select school students in the area K.H. Ahmad Dahlan Samarinda is a mode of shuttle transportation (47,368%), private motor (41,520%), public transportation (7,310%), walking distance (3,216%), and for last private car (0,585%).

                From the results of the analysis obtained mathematical model of priority scale goals of school students in the area K.H. Ahmad Dahlan Samarinda namely Ymbp (0.0016), Ymrp (0.1069), Yau (0.0188), Yaj (0.1259), Ybk (0.0084).


Keywords


Selection of transportation mode, public transportation, private transportation, Analytical Hierarchy Process

Full Text:

doc

References


Brodjonegoro, P.S, 1991, Petunjuk Mengenai Teori dan Aplikasi dari Model The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Jakarta : Sapta Utama.

Bowersox, C. (1981). Inroduction to Transportation. New York : Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc.

Djoko Setijowarno, R. B. Frazila, 2001, Pengantar Sistem Transportasi, Semarang: Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata.

Miro, Fidel., (2002). Perencanaan Transportasi. Erlangga, Jakarta.

Morlok, Edward K., (1984). Pengantar Teknik dan Perencanaan Transportasi. Penerbit Erlangga Jakarta.

Munawar. 2005. Pemodelan Visual dengan UML. Graha Ilmu: Yogyakarta.

Nasution, M.N. (2004). Manajemen Jasa Terpadu. Jakarta: PT Ghalia Indonesia.

Nursid Samaatmadja. (1998). Studi Geografi Suatu Pendekatan dan Analisa Keruangan. Bandung :Alumni.

Papacostas, C.S. Prevedous P.D. (1987). Tranportation Engineering and Planning. New Jersey : 2nd edition. Prentice-Hall Inc.

Pabundu Tika, Moh. 1997. Metode Penelitian Geografi. Jakarta: PT GramediaPustaka utama.

Saaty, T.L., 1986, Proses Hirarki Analitik untuk Pengambilan Keputusan Dalam Situasi yang Kompleks, Jakarta : PT Pustaka Binman Pressindo.

Soesantiyo. 1985. Teknik Lalu Lintas, Traffic Engineering Jilid 1, Jakarta.

Steenbrink, 1974, Optimization of Transport Networks, Tugas Akhir Universitas Jendral Soedirman, Purwokerto.

Sugiyono. 2009. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. CV.Alfabeta:Bandung.

Tamin, O. Z, 2000. Perencanaan dan Pemodelan Transportasi, Institut Teknologi Bandung,Edisi Kedua, Bandung.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 Tentang Lalu Lintas Dan Angkutan Jalan.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


VOL 1. NOMOR 1. AGUSTUS 2012