STUDI KOMPARASI PENYELESAIAN PERSELISIHAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL MELALUI MEDIASI DAN KONSILIASI

Sastiono Kesek

Abstract


Since the birth of Law No. 2 of 2004 concerning about industrial disputes settlement, the parties to the dispute becomes easier and aided in order to settle a dispute between them. Instrument provided also become more diverse compared to the old rules. Like instrument of mediation, conciliation and arbitration. However, in the application stage, not many people understand the difference between the disputing mediation and conciliation which in terms of the origin and function of mediation from conciliation has a characteristic that varies as a mediator in the nature of a passive mediation while in conciliation konsiliatornya more active in resolving disputes.

 

In the settlement of industrial disputes mediation is used as the main instrument for solving broader scope than conciliation. Mediation can handle disputes over rights, interests, employment termination (PHK) and disputes between unions in one company. Conciliation made limited progress on conflict of interest, termination of employment disputes and disputes between unions in one company. Although in reality most of the industrial dispute that involves a dispute over rights. The writing instrument of mediation and conciliation mengkomparasi comprehensively describe the advantages and disadvantages of each such instrument.


Keywords


mediation, consiliation, industrial relationship

Full Text:

Pdf

References


Adolf, Huala dan Chandrawulan, A., 1994, Masalah-masalah Hukum Dalam Perdagangan Internasional, RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Campbell Black, Henry, 1990, Black’s Law Dictionary, Min West Publishing Co, Sixth edition. ST.Paul.

Goldberg, Stephen, et. Al., 1995, Dispute Resolution Negotiation, Mediation and Other Processes, Little, Brown and Company, Boston, New York, Toronto, London.

H. Priyatna Abdurrasyid, 2002, Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (APS) (Arbitration – Alternative Dispute Resolution-ADR), Fikahati Aneska bekerjasama dengan badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesi (BANI), Jakarta.

Haley, Nolan, 1992, Alternatif Disputes Resolution, St. Paul, Minnesota.

Harahap, M. Yahya, 1996, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Merupkan Jawabann Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdagangan Internasional masa Depan, Makalah, Seminar nasional hukum bisnis, FH. UKSW, Semarang.

Haq, Murgiana, 1998, Copyright infringement and Alternative Dispute Resolution, JII, AOTS.

Husni, Lalu, 2007, Penyelesaian Perselisihan hubungan Industrial melalui Pengadilan & di Luar Pengadilan, RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Joni Emirzon, 2001, Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.

Khairandy, Ridwan, 1999, Pengantar Hukum Dagang Indonesia, diterbitkan atas kerjasama pusat studi hukum fakultas hukum UII dengan Gama Media, Yogyakarta.

Khakim, Abdul, 2003, Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Kertonegoro, Sentanoe, 1999, Hubungan Industrial, Hubungan antara Pengusaha dan Pekerja (biparti) dan Pemerintah (Tripartit), Yayasan tenaga Kerja Indonesia, Jakarta.

Munir Fuady, 2000, Arbitrase Nasional: Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis. Citra Aditya Bhakti, Bandung.

Rajagukguk, Erman, Penyelesaian Sengketa Alternatif, fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.

Sutiyoso, Bambang, 2008, Hukum Arbitrase dan alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, Gama Media, Yogyakarta.

Usman, Rachmadi, 2003, Pilihan Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Luar Pengadilan, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

W. Moore, Christopher, 1995, Mediasi Lingkungan, Indonesian Center for Environmental Law dan CDR Associates, Jaskarta.

Widjaja, Gunawan, 2005, Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Widjaja, Gunawan, 2003, Hukum Arbitrase, cetakan ke 3, RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31293/ddk.v31i2.1466

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.