KEWAJIBAN ORANG TUA DALAM MELAPORKAN ANAKNYA SEBAGAI PECANDU NARKOTIKA DITINJAU BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 35 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG NARKOTIKA

Adi Pratama Nur

Abstract


ABSTRACT

The number of children who become victims of narcotics higher each year required an effective way in order to reduce the number of children who become drug addicts getting down. The authors need to raise the issue of children who become addicted to narcotics, to be a deterrent effect for the cause of children becoming drug addicts, and to be also held the responsibility. The purpose of this thesis, namely: First, the need for criminal responsibility by parents to their eraser against liability legislation of conflicting namely Law On Narcotics with the Child Protection Act. This type of research can be classified into types of normative legal research that discusses the general principles of law, systematic law, and comparative law. From the research there are problems, there are two main things that data concluded. First, So if I researched, the person most responsible for actually increasing the number of children who become a drug addict is a parent. In accordance with Act No. 35 of 2014, the parent is obliged to protect the mental and physical development of the child. And if the author is raised through the theory of criminal liability, the parent is the person most responsible. Thus, according to the author of the number of children who become drug addicts rehabilitated and imprisoned should be accompanied by a parent who participates become criminal offenders because they have neglected to keep her child. In accordance with Article 55 Paragraph (1) of Law No. 35 of 2009, parents have been deemed to know even though he did not know if his son became a drug addict, and if it does not do notable be subject to criminal sanctions in accordance with Article 128 of Law No. 35 of 2009. Second, the author also analyzes the juridical what if the parents have their own initiative to undertake rehabilitation treatment in private by not required to report to the authorities in accordance with Law No. 35 of 2009. On one side of the parents run the obligation to carry out rehabilitation treatment to children with do not nofitable due to negative stigma society and can be a delay in the child’s education according to the Law on the Protection of children.


References


DAFTAR PUSTAKA

A. Buku Bacaan

Andi Hamzah dan R.M. Surachman, 1994, Kejahatan Narkotika dan Psikotropika, Sinar Grafika,Jakarta.

____________, 1994, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta,

Assofa, 1996, Metode Penelitian Hukum, PT.Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Anton Subibyo, ‘’Didominasi Pelajar dan Mahasiswa’’,Semarang

Arief, Barda Nawawi, 2008, Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Kencana Prenada, Jakarta.

B. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 1949 Tentang Obat Bius.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan.

Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1997 Tentang Psikotropika

Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 1997 Tentang Narkotika.

Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1979 Tentang Kesejahteraan.

Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 1989 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Law ( Jurnal Ilmu Hukum )

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Contact person :

Amin Slamet

Faculty of Law. 17 August 1945 University of Samarinda
Jl.Ir.H.Juanda, No.80. Samarinda. East Kalimantan. Indonesia

Email : journalofl@gmail.com

Telp: 0541-743390

Lisensi Creative Commons
Journal of Law is licensed below Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.