KEDUDUKAN BARANG BUKTI DALAM PERKARA PIDANA DITINJAU BERDASARKAN KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM ACARA PIDANA

Julius Bernat Hasibuan

Abstract


ABSTRACT

In the Criminal Procedure Code, the evidence is not regulated in it but in the Criminal Procedure Code, the term evidence, also known as the term evidence, it appears that the evidence is not mentioned as included in one of the valid evidences. In other words, evidence is not a proof, questions can arise from here regarding the position of "evidence". Based on this description, the main problems in this paper are: (1) How the position of the evidence in the process of proving criminal cases according to the Criminal Procedure Code and (2) Is the Evidence a basis for proving a crime according to the Criminal Procedure Code. The approach to the problem used is normative juridical, legislative approach and co-conceptual approach. Collection of materials used are primary, secondary and tertiary data, collection of materials and processing of materials with literature. In this study, it will be analyzed using qualitative normative methods with deductive logic, namely thinking with general things that lead to specific things. The evidence basically can be used to declare an error in a criminal act, with a note that the evidence used as supporting evidence is valid as stipulated in the Criminal Procedure Code, because basically as long as the evidence is an item used to commit a criminal act , or an item is a result of a criminal act, the evidence is also supported by evidence. As for the author's suggestion in the changes to the KUHAP in the future, it should be one of the things that deserves to be implemented in its change is a clearer arrangement related to the position of evidence, as part of the evidentiary instrument in a criminal case.

 

.Keywords: Evidence Item, Evidence Tool, Evidence and KUHAP.


Full Text:

PDF

References


B. Saran

Sebaiknya barang bukti diatur lebih jelas didalam KUHAP kedepannya.

dibutuhkan penekanan pada pendidikan tinggi hukum terkait perbedaan antara alat bukti dan barang bukti, serta keududukan masing-masing dalam kepentingan pembuktian perkara pidana.

.

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

A. BUKU BACAAN

Mahmud Peter Marzuki, 2005, Penelitian Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta.

https://www.ferlianusgulo.web.id/2016/04/barang-bukti-alat-bukti-berdasarkan.html, diakses 03 Maret 2019

Giant K.Y Sepang, https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/3380-ID-pembuktian-suatu-tindak-pidana-berdasarkan-barang-bukti-menurut-pasal-183-kuhap.pdf,, diakses tanggal 01 Maret 2019

https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/lt4e8ec99e4d2ae/apa-perbedaan-alat-bukti-dengan-barang- bukti-, diakses tanggal 21 maret 2019.

Sasangka, Hari dan Lily Rosita, Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Pidana, Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2003.

B. PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN

Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana

UU No.8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (lembaran Negara RI Tahun 1981 Nomor 76, Tambahan Lembaran Negara RI Nomor 5062)

UU No.35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika (Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2009 Nomor 143, Tambahan Lembaran Negara RI Nomor 5062)


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Law ( Jurnal Ilmu Hukum )

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Contact person :

Amin Slamet

Faculty of Law. 17 August 1945 University of Samarinda
Jl.Ir.H.Juanda, No.80. Samarinda. East Kalimantan. Indonesia

Email : journalofl@gmail.com

Telp: 0541-743390

Lisensi Creative Commons
Journal of Law is licensed below Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.