PENGARUH KEPEMIMPINAN TERHADAP DISIPLIN KERJA PEGAWAI PADA KANTOR KECAMATAN SAMARINDA KOTA
Abstract
The results of the study show that there is no significant relationship between leadership and employee work discipline at the Samarinda City District Office.
From the results of calculations that Leadership that occurs in the environment at the Samarinda City District Office has not been able to foster awareness of employees below it in the discipline of work. This is due to the fact that there is still a thought of most employees that the discipline carried out by the leaders cannot be imitated, in the sense that the discipline is carried out only because there is an interest in fearing the leadership above it.
The low work discipline of most employees causes a lot of work to be delayed and decreases public confidence in the services provided.
The leadership expected by everyone in the Samarinda Kota District Office is transactional and national leadership, which is to expect leaders who have strong, authoritative, consistent and willing to understand the needs of subordinates. As stated by L.M. Berry, (2008: 130) that developing the concept of transformational and transactional leadership is based on Maslow's opinion on the hierarchy of human needs. This connection can be understood by the idea that lower employee needs, such as physiological needs and security can only be fulfilled through the practice of transactional leadership styles. Conversely, P. Bycio et al (2005: 112) suggest that higher needs, such as self-esteem and self-actualization, can only be fulfilled through the practice of transformational leadership styles. In contrast, authoritarian leadership is generally less favored by subordinates, although authoritarian leadership is sometimes needed to support the achievement of a particular target of work. This is illustrated by the opinions of respondents who position authoritarian leadership in the third position of the two previous types of leadership (transaction and transformational).
Because the attitude and behavior of the leader becomes the size of the employee in carrying out their duties, discipline cannot grow on its own without motivation coming from outside. Even if awareness of discipline comes from within him, of course there are certain motives that make it such, for example the desire to achieve a certain achievement.
Keywords
Full Text:
DocReferences
As’ad, M, 2008. Seri Ilmu Sumber Daya Manusia, Psikologi
Amalia, R. 2002. Hubungan antara Persepsi Terhadap Gaya Kepemimpinan dengan Keterlibatan Kerja dan Sikap Positif Karyawan. Skripsi. (Tidak Diterbitkan). Fakultas Psikologi UMS, Surakarta.
Anaroga. 1992. Psikologi Kerja. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
B. M. Bass., 2000. Bass and Stogdill’s Hand Book of Leadership. New York: Free Press.
B.M. Bass., 2007. Does Transactional – Transformational Leadership Paradigm Transcend Organizational and National Boundaries? Journal American Psychologist, 52: 130-139.
Bimo Walgito, 2004. Pengantar Psikologi Umum. Andi Offset, Yogyakarta.
Bimo Walgito., 2003. Psikologi Suatu Pengantar. Andi Offset, Yogyakarta.
Husain Umar., 2004. Riset Sumberdaya Manusia. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.
J.C. Brigham., 2004. Social Psychology. Edisi 2. Harper Collins, New York.
J.M. Howell and Avolio, B.J. 1993. Transformational Leadership, Transactional Leadership, Locus of Control, and Support for Innovation: Key Predictors of Consolidated-Business-Unit Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78 (6): 680-694.
J.M. Howell and K. E. Hall-Merenda., 2009. The Ties That Bind: The Impact of Leader-Member Exchange, Transformational and Transactional Leadership, and Distance on Predicting Follower Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2004 (5): 395-401.
James A. Black dan D.J. Champion., 2001. Metode dan Masalah Penelitian Sosial. Refika Aditama, Bandung.
Yasin., 2009. Peningkatan Pembinaan Disiplin Nasional dalam Sistem dan Pola Pendidikan Nasional. Dalam Analisis CSIS. No. 4 Tahun XVII, Juli-Agustus 2009, Jakarta.Earl Babbie, 2006. Menerapkan Metode Penelitian Survai untuk Ilmu-ilmu Sosial. Palmall, Yogyakarta.
Julia Brannen, 2007. Memadu Metode Penelitian Kualitatif & Kuantitatif (alih bahasa: H. Nuktah Arfawie Kurde, Imam Syafe’I, Noorhaidi A.H.), Kerjasama antara Fakultas Tarbiyah IAIN Antasari Samarinda dengan Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.
Kartini Kartono, 2006. Psikologi Sosial untuk Managemen dan Industri. Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
Koentjaraningrat, 2005. Metode Penelitian Masyarakat, Gramedia, Jakarta.
Komaruddin., 2004. Kamus Riset. Angkasa, Bandung.
L.M. Berrry., 2008. Psychology at Work. New York: McGraw-Hill International.
L.M. Berry and Houston, J.P. 2003. Psychology at Work. An Introduction to Industrial and Organizational Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill International.
Masri Singarimbun dan Sofian Effendi, 2007. Metode Penelitian Survai, Cetakan 8, LP3ES, Jakarta.
Muhammad Ali.,2004. Penelitian Pendidikan Prosedur dan Strategi. Angksa, Bandung.
Nanus., 2002. Visionary Leadership. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Fransisco.
P. Bycio, Hackett, R.D., and Allen, J.S. 2005. Further Assessments of Bass’s., 1985. Conceptualization of Transactional and Transformational Leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000 (4): 468-478.Winarno Surachmad., 2002. Pengantar Penelitian Dasar dan Metode Teknik, Tarsito, Bandung.
R. Aninda., 2005. Hubungan antara Persepsi terhadap Gaya Kepemimpinan Job Centered dengan Sikap Penerimaan terhadap Penilaian Kerja. Skripsi (Tidak Diterbitkan). Fakultas Psikologi UMS, Surakarta.
R. Eisenbach, Watson, K., and Pillai, R. 2009. Transformational Leadership in The Context of Organizational Change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12 (2): 80-88.
Sugiyono., 2007. Statistik Untuk Penelitian. Alfabeta, Bndung
Sugiyono., 2005. Metode Penelitian Administrasi. Alfabeta, Bandung.
Sutrisno Hadi., 2000. Metodologi Research. Andi Offset, Yogyakarta.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.