Teofilus Erimansyah -


Human resources are the most strategic element in the organization, must be recognized and accepted management . Increased productivity may only be done by humans. Instead of human resources that can also be the cause of waste and inefficiency in its various forms ( Siagian , 2002) . Because it gives attention to the human element is one of the demands in the overall effort to increase labor productivit, Terry ( 1960), assume leadership as activities to influence people to work with willing to achieve a common goal . Broadly defined leadership as an organized effort to manage and utilize human resources, material, and financial in order to achieve the stated goals ( Zainun , 1979). The Bass and Stogdill (1990 ) , says that leadership is a process of influencing the activities of a group in an effort to achieve the goals set . In addition, a leader figure is expected to run a leadership function properly by applying leadership style , and formulate what style of leadership , based on the description / explanation above, the researcher aims to identify and analyze the participative leadership style ( X1 ) , persuasive ( X2 ) , motivational ( X3 ) , and educational ( X4 ) significantly affects the productivity of warehouse PT . Thiess , site Melak , West Kutai.

To facilitate data analysis of this study , the data obtained should be simplified in advance . To determine whether there is influence between the variables examined, the researchers used the classical assumption test and to determine the accuracy of prediction of whether there is a strong relationship between the dependent variable ( Y ) employee productivity with the independent variable ( X ) leadership style, so in this study using multiple linear regression analysis . With the research hypothesis testing reject or accept the hypothesis being tested .

By using a multiple linear regression analysis and hypothesis testing, it can be concluded that the hypothesis is accepted , that the motivational leadership style, and educational , the most dominant influence on the productivity of warehouse PT. Thiess, site Melak , Kutai Barat.


Leadership and Productivity

Full Text:



Algifari. 1997. Statistika Induktif Untuk Ekonomi dan Bisnis. Yogyakarta: UPP AMP YKPN

. 1997. Analisis Statistik Untuk Bisnis; Dengen Regresi, Korelasi dan Nonparametrik. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Anoraga, Pandji. 1992. Psikologi Kepemimpinan. Cetakan ke-2. Jakarta: Rhineka Cipta.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 1991. Prosedur Penelitian. Cetakan ke-7. Jakarta: Reneka cipta.

Ghozali, Imam. 2005. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Semarang : Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Irianto, Jausuf. 2001. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Surabaya: Insan Cendekia.

Panggabean. 2002. Manajamen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Priyatno, Duwi. 2008. Paham Analisis Statistik Data Dengan SPSS. Yogyakarta: Mediakom.

Rivai, Veithzal. 2005. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Perusahaan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sedarmayanti. 2009. Sumber Daya Manusia dan Produktivitas Kerja, cetakan ke-3, Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju.

Siagian, Sondang P. 1995. Sumber Daya Manajemen Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Sugiyono. 2001. Metode Penelitian Administrasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.

. 2001. Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Cetakan pertama. Yogyakarta: CV. Alfabeta.

Sumarsono, HM. Sonny. 2004. Metode Riset Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, edisi 1. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Sutrisno, Edy. 2009. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, cetakan ke-1, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Teguh Sulistiani, Ambar. 2004. Memahami Good Governance dalam Perspektif Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: Gaya Media.

Usman, H. & R. Purnomo Setiady Akbar. 2000. Pengantar Statistika. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Usmara. 2002. Paradigma Baru Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: Amara Books.



  • There are currently no refbacks.