KINERJA PEGAWAI DI BADAN PENANAMAN MODAL DAERAH (BPMD) KABUPATEN KUTAI TIMUR
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of leadership style, Education and Training, and Discipline motivasi Work on Employee Performance in the Regional Investment Board (BPMD) East Kutai regency.
Analysis model is used to prove the hypothesis is a model of multiple linear regression analysis with the number of respondents 58 permanent employees and temporary employees (PTT) in the Regional Investment Board (BPMD) East Kutai regency.
Statistical analysis showed regression coefficients independent variables, namely Leadership Style (X1) = 0.100, Education and Training (X2) = 0.036, Work Environment (X3) = -0.204, Work Motivation (X4) = 0.148 and Work Discipline (X5 ) = 0.744 and -1.077 constant at the value obtained from the linear regression equation gerganda are:
Y = 0.358 +0.347 +0.1 X1 + X2 (-0.204 +0.744 X3 +0.148 X4 X5
From the results obtained by analysis of the correlation coefficient R value of 0.707, which means jointly Leadership Style variable (X1), Education and Training (X2), Work Environment (X3), Work Motivation (X4) and Work Discipline (X5) has a relationship Strong on employee performance in the Regional Investment Board (BPMD) East Kutai regency.
It is shown from the results of the determinant coefficient (R2) of 0.562, which means that the performance of employees in the Regional Investment Board (BPMD) East Kutai Regency influenced by leadership style variable (X1), Education and Training (X2), Work Environment (X3), Work Motivation (X4) and Work Discipline (X5).
Results of this study indicate that all independent variables simultaneously have a significant influence on the performance of employees in the Regional Investment Board (BPMD) East Kutai Regency, it is shown from the results of the F test was 6.028 greater than F table 2.38 and Sig. Of 0.00 is smaller than alpha of 0.05.
The results also indicate the dominant variables that affect the performance of the Work Discipline t test was the highest count that is equal to 4,626 and the highest beta value of 0.744 significant at 0.000 <0.05.
F test and t-test proved that the first hypothesis and the second hypothesis is accepted.
References
Algifari 1997, Statistika Indikatif, untuk Ekonomi dan Bisnis, UPP AMP YKPN, Yogyakarya.
Bass,B.M., 1990, Handbook of Leadership: A Survey of Theory and Research, Free Press, New York.
Fleishman, E.A., 1973, “Twenty years of Consideration and Structure,”in Current development in the study of leadership, Illinois University Press.
Ghalia Indonesia. Y.W. Sunindhia dan Ninik Widyanti, 1988. Penerapan manajemen Dan Kepemimpinan Dalam Pembangunan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Ghozali, Imam 2005 Aplikasi analisis Multivatiate dengan program SPSS, Badan Penerbit Undip, Semarang.
Gibson, Ivancevich dan Donnelly, 1995, Organisasi Perilaku Struktur, Proses, Edisi Kelima, Erlangga, Jakarta.
Handayaningrat, S., 1980, Pengantar Studi Administrasi dan Manajemen, Gunung Agung, Jakarta.
Hasibuan,H.Melayu 2005, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Gunung Agung, jakarta
Husnan, Suad, 1989 Pokok-Pokok Pengertian dan Soal jawab manajemen BPFE UGM, Yogyakarta.
Husaini Usman dan Puraomo Setiady Akbar, 1995. Metode Penelitian Sosial. Erlangga. Jakarta.
Husein Usman, 1998. Riset Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta :Gramedia Pustaka Bumi Aksara .Bandung.
Indrianto, Nur dan Bamban Supomo 1999 Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis untuk Akuntansi dan Manajemen, Edisi Pertama,BPFE UGM Yogyakarta.
Irmin Soejidno, 2005 Mengelola Potensi dan Motivasi Bawahan, PT Seyma Media Indonesia
Ismani HP 1996, Administrasi Negara Birokrasi dan Etos Kerja, Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi Universitas Brawijaya, Malang.
Kartono, K., 1992, Pengantar Metodologi Riset Sosial, Alumni, Bandung.
Karya. Masri Singarimbun Dan Sofian Effendi (ed), 1987. Metode Penelitian Survey Jakarta: LP3ES
Karyadi, M. 1977, Kepemimpinan (Leadership), Politean, Bogor.
Keating, C.J., 1986, Kepemimpinan: Teori dan Pengembangannya (diterjemahkan oleh Mangunhardjana), Kanisius, Yogjakarta.
Kuncoro, Mudrajad,2003 Metode Riset untuk Bisnis Ekonomi , Erlangga Jakarta
Kusnaka Adimiharja, 1994. Metode Penelitian Sosial. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosda.
Maholtra 1999 Marketing Research (New Jersey)
Mangkunegara, A Anwar Prabu, 2005, Evaluasi Kinerja SDM, Bandung PT.Refika Aditama
M.Manulang dan Marihot AAMH Manulang 2004, Manajemen Personalia. Gajah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.
M. Riaas Rasyid, 1996. Makna Pemerintahan Tinjauan Dari Segi Etika Dan Kepemimpinan. Jakarta.
Moleong, L., 1990, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung.
Nitisemito, Alex S 1992, Manajemen Personalia ( Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia) cetakan IX, edisi ketiga Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.
Robbins Stephen P 2004, Pengantar Manajemen, Gramedia Jakarta.
Santoso dan Ashari, 2005, Analisa Statistik dengan Microsaft Excel & SPSS, Yogyakarta
Soedarmayanti, Manajemen SUmber Daya Manusia, Reformasi Birokrasi dan Manajemen PNS, Refika Aditama, Bandung 2007.
Schein, E.H., 1985, Organizational Culture and Leadership, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Soehardjono, 1981. Kepemimpinan. Malang : Rineka Cipta
Sugiyono 2005, Statistik untuk penelitian, Alfabeta Bandung.
Sumarsono, M,Sonny 2004, Metode Riset Sumber Daya Manusia, Graha Ilmu Yogyakarta.
Sutarto, 1991, Dasar-dasar Organisasi, Cetakan ke 14, Gajah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.
Taliziduhu Ndralia, 1997. Pengantar Teori Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia.
Thoha, M., 1993, Kepemimpinan Dalam Manajemen, Cetakan Kelima, PT. Rajawali Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Umar, Husen 2003 Riset Sumber Daya Manusia dalam Organisasi, Gramedia Pustaka Utama Jakarta.
Utama. Kartini Kartono, 1994. Pemimpin Dan Kepemimpinan. Jakarta: CV. Rajawali.
Yasrif Watampone. Pamudji, S, 1995. Kepemimpinan Pemerintahan Indonesia: Yayasan Karya Dharma.
Yukl, G. A., 1998, Kepemimpinan dalam Organisasi (diterjemahkan oleh Jusuf Udaya), Prenhallindo, Jakarta.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31293/ekm.v2i1.306
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.