PERAN KOMISI YUDISIAL DALAM PENGAWASAN PELANGGARAN KODE ETIK DAN PEDOMAN PERILAKU HAKIM
Abstract
The State of Indonesia is a democratic constitutional state, based on Pancasila and the
1945 Constitution of the Republic State of Indonesia, which upholds human rights and guarantees all citizens at the same time in law and government and is obliged to uphold such law and government without exception.
The judge is the organs of the court on which should be placed duty and great responsibility for law and justice can be enforced, but on the other hand Judge is also an ordinary man who in carrying out his duty that can’t be separated from mistakes either intentionally or unintentionally.
Many public scrutiny that saw the duties of a judge was questioned, ranging from the behavior of a dormant judge while performing his duties in the courtroom, to the alleged bribery to the judge when handling a case including Judge's infidelity into a bleak portrait of public concern.
Given the many phenomena of irregularities committed by Judges above, it is necessary an independent institution in charge of providing oversight of violations of ethical codes and judicial behavior guidelines. This judicial commission was established to fulfill a sense of justice and truth for the community with a background.
In this research, the author uses normative legal research methods, and empirical law research methods as well. However, researchers will focus more on normative legal research, while empirical law research serves as supporting information. Using primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials.
The oversight of the judicial commission is carried out both internally and externally to ensure that all judges as the principal implementers of the court function shall be of high integrity, honesty and professionalism, thereby gaining the trust of the community and seekers of justice.
The public may participate in supervising the behavior of judges in order to bring about a clean and professional judiciary through community reports. Reports may be conducted by individuals, groups of people, public entities, legal entities, corporation or Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) who are aware of alleged code violations Judicial conduct ethics and judicial guidelines and not limited to the injured party. As reported is the Judge allegedly violating the Code of Ethics and Judicial Conduct Guidelines.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
The State of Indonesia is a democratic constitutional state, based on Pancasila and the
Constitution of the Republic State of Indonesia, which upholds human rights and guarantees all citizens at the same time in law and government and is obliged to uphold such law and government without exception.
The judge is the organs of the court on which should be placed duty and great responsibility for law and justice can be enforced, but on the other hand Judge is also an ordinary man who in carrying out his duty that can’t be separated from mistakes either intentionally or unintentionally.
Many public scrutiny that saw the duties of a judge was questioned, ranging from the behavior of a dormant judge while performing his duties in the courtroom, to the alleged bribery to the judge when handling a case including Judge's infidelity into a bleak portrait of public concern.
Given the many phenomena of irregularities committed by Judges above, it is necessary an independent institution in charge of providing oversight of violations of ethical codes and judicial behavior guidelines. This judicial commission was established to fulfill a sense of justice and truth for the community with a background.
In this research, the author uses normative legal research methods, and empirical law research methods as well. However, researchers will focus more on normative legal research, while empirical law research serves as supporting information. Using primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials.
The oversight of the judicial commission is carried out both internally and externally to ensure that all judges as the principal implementers of the court function shall be of high integrity, honesty and professionalism, thereby gaining the trust of the community and seekers of justice.
The public may participate in supervising the behavior of judges in order to bring about a clean and professional judiciary through community reports. Reports may be conducted by individuals, groups of people, public entities, legal entities, corporation or Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) who are aware of alleged code violations Judicial conduct ethics and judicial guidelines and not limited to the injured party. As reported is the Judge allegedly violating the Code of Ethics and Judicial Conduct Guidelines.
Adi Sulistiyono, Pembanguan Kemampuan Hakim dari Perspektif Sosilogis, Makalah disampaiakn dalam lokakarya Pengembangan Kemampuan Hakim, Kerjasama Komisi Yudisial, Pengadilan Tinggi, Manado.
Jimly Asshiddiqie, Struktur Ketatanegaraan Indonesia setelah perubahan ke empat UUD Tahun 1945”, makalah dsampaikan pada seminar pembangunan hukum VIII, diselenggarakan oleh Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kemenkumham RI, Denpasar, 14-18 Juli 2003.
KMS A Roni, Sekilas pandang Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, disampaikan pada Lokakarya Peningkatan Pemahaman Masyarakat terhadap Dugaan Pelanggaran KEPPH tanggal 17 Mei 2017.
Indra Syamsu, Makalah peningkatan pemahaman masyarakat teradap dugaan pelangnggaran KEPPH”, disampaikan pada Lokakarya, tanggal 18 Mei
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 24B Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2004 Tentang Komisi Yudisial Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2009
Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 1985
Tentang Mahkamah Agung
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2009
Tentang Kekuasaan Hakim
Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2011 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang
Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2004 Tentang Komisi Yudisial.
http://arieflawyer.blogspot.co.id/2011/05/masalah-teknis-yudisial-dan- pengawasan.html. diunggah tanggal 29 Mei 2016, pukul 17.50 Wita.
http://www.antikorupsi.org/en/content/membasmi-hakim-nakal diakses tanggal
Mei 2017 pukul 16.30 Wita
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31293/lg.v2i1.2837
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 LEGALITAS
