Futum Hubaib


The purpose of this study is to know and examine matters as follows: Factors that affect the employee job satisfaction in Sub Division Treasury Finance Division Regional Secretariat Kutai Kartanegara and know the most dominant factors affect employee job satisfaction

To analyze the data obtained by researchers using multiple regression analysis tools and SPSS application (Statistic Product and Service Solution) Based on the results of data analysis using SPSS and discussion then the conclusions can be put forward are:

The resulting regression equation is Y = 2.779 + 0.030X1 + 0.136 X2. The resulting value is marked positive which means having a direct relationship. The constant value (a) of 2.779 states that if X1 and X2 are equal to zero. Then the satisfaction of cooperation with 2.779 or can be said if there is no variable of employee factor (X1) and job factor (X2) then job satisfaction (Y) equal to 2,779.

Result of F test calculation, Fcount value is 4,303 with significance level 0,000. Since probability (0,000) is less than 0.05, regression model can be used to predict job satisfaction, or it can be said that the variable of employee factor and work factor that applied together have an effect on job satisfaction.

The value of R Square (Determination R or R2) shows the number of 0.806 from 8982, thus it can be said that the independent variables of employee and occupational factors have an influence of 0.806 or 8.06% have the level of variable relations factor employee and job factors against job satisfaction is very strong. Based on the above description, the first hypothesis has been presented.

Result of t test calculation between employee with job satisfaction, it can be seen that thitung> ttable or 2,815> 2,021 with significance level 0,000 <0,005, indicate that tcount> ttable or 2,743> 2,021 with significance level 0,001 <0,005 meaning work variable variable partially significantly indicating its effect on job satisfaction. So variable of employee factor have the most dominant influence influence job satisfaction compare of work factor variable. Thus the second hypothesis that the researcher submitted was accepted.

Full Text:



Gomes, Faustino Cardoso. 2003. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Kedua, CV. Andi Offset, Yogyakarta.

Handoko, T. Hani. 2000. Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Kedua. BPFE. Yogyakarta.

Hasibuan, Malayu S.P. 2003. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Revisi. PT. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.

Mangkunegara, A.A.Anwar Prabu. 2007. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Cetakan Ketujuh. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung.

Notoatmodjo, Soekidjo. 2003. Pengembangan Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Cetakan ketiga. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.

Robbins.Stephen P. 2006. Perilaku Organisasi. Edisi Kesepuluh. Alih Bahasa : Benyamin Molan. PT. Indeks. Jakarta.

dan Timothy A. Judge. 2008. Perilaku Organisasi, Organization Behaviour. Buku pertama. Edisi Kedua belas. Alih Bahasa : Diana Angelica. Salemba Empat. Jakarta.

Sedarmayanti. 2001. Sumber Daya Manusia dan Produktivitas Kerja. CV. Mandar Maju. Bandung.

Siagian, Sondang P. 2008. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Pertama. Cetakan Keenam Belas. PT. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.

Simamora, Henry. 2001. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Ketiga. Cetakan Kedua. STIE YKPN. Yogyakarta.

Sugiyono. 2000. Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Cetakan Ketiga. CV. Alfabeta. Bandung.

Wursanto,Ig. 2003. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Organisasi. Edisi pertama. Andi Yogyakarta.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 LEGALITAS