DUGAAN BELUM DIKEMBALIKANNYA BARANG MILIK NEGARA OLEH EKS PEJABAT NEGARA

Abstract

State officials have a mandate from the people to run their positions in
accordance with their duties. In order to perform their duties, state
officials are given the authority to use state facilities to facilitate their
work. But what happens if state officials allegedly misuse the state's
facilities. The crowd's enthusiasm was recently shocked by the news of the
alleged not yet returned of the use of state assets by ex state officials.
This Assets’ State is intended as a facility for state officials in running
their basic daily tasks and functions (instrumental values). If it is indeed
true that there are state officials who have allegedly not returned the
Assets’ State even though their term of office has expired, then this is no
longer in line with its instrumental value because the purpose of using
Assets’ State has deviated from what it should be.
This paper is more focused on normative writing that is by reviewing some
references related to the Assets’ State is connected by legal theories and
regulations according to the author's perspective, based on the ethic
theory, criminal perspective, etc. The authors suggest that another ex
official state should have awareness so as to prevent similar cases will
happen in the future and for be more sensitive and responsible in
managing this country.