PEMBUKTIAN TINDAK PIDANA ASAL DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 8 TAHUN 2010 TENTANG PENCEGAHAN DAN PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG

Farahwati Farahwati

Abstract


Criminal cases related to assets or assets resulting from crime are known as money laundering crimes. The money laundering case is not only a threat to the stability and integrity of the economy and the state financial system, but also endangers the lives of the people, the nation and the State of Indonesia. In its development, money laundering offenses cases are increasingly widespread and complex to various sectors. The problem in this paper is whether the criminal act of Money Laundering must first be proven the crime of origin, and what are the legal evidence in the Law on the Prevention and Eradication of the Crime of Money Laundering. There is a close relationship between the crime of money laundering and the crime of origin. These problems arise in the prosecution process related to whether both must be proven or is it sufficient to prove the crime of money laundering without first proving the original crime. The reason is, in the regulation regarding the prosecution of money laundering cases, namely Article 69 of Law No. 8 of 2010 concerning Prevention and Eradication of the Crime of Money Laundering stipulates that in conducting investigations, prosecutions and examinations in courts of cases of Money Laundering, it is not obligatory to first prove the original crime.

The normative juridical writing method uses primary and secondary legal materials with qualitative juridical analysis. Analysis of the effectiveness of handling the crime of money laundering without prior proof of the predicate crime, in terms of handling the crime of money laundering without the obligation to prove the predicate crime can be said to be effective because it can facilitate the judicial process. In the crime of money laundering, it still provides an opportunity to prove that the assets obtained are assets resulting from legitimate activities.


Keywords


Predicate Crime, Money Laundering, Evidence.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adami Chazawi, Media Nusa Creative. Edisi Revisi, Hukum Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi, 2018., Malang

Elwi Daniel., 2011, Korupsi, Konsep,Tindak Pidana dan Pemberantasannya, Rajawali Pers., Jakarta.

Fahrojih, Ikwan. 2016. Hukum Acara Pidana Korupsi. Malang: Setaara Press.

Harrys Pratama Teguh, Usep Saepullah, Teori Dan Praktek Hukum Acara Pidana Khusus, Cetakan 1 Juni 2016 Pustaka Setia Bandung

M. Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP, Penyidikan Dan Penuntutan, Edidi ke dua 2015, Sinar Grafika , Jakarta.

Rodliyah, Salim, Hukum Pidana Khusus ‘Unsur Dan Sanksi Pidananya’ cetakan kedua April 2019, PT. RajaGRafindo Persada Depok.

Wiyono, Pembahasan Undang-Undang Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang, 2014, Jakarta Sinar Grafika.

PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN

Undang - Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP)

Kitab Undang - Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2002 Tentang Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.

Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2003 tentang perubahan Atas Undang-Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2002 tentang Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang,

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31293/lg.v7i1.6514

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 LEGALITAS : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum