Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa Tingkat Ii Akademi Keperawatan Dirgahayu Samarinda
Abstract
This studyaims to describethe effect of motivation on students' academic achiev ementlevelIIat Nursing Academy Dirgahayu Samarinda.This study is quantitative with associative purpose, namely to explain causal relationships between variable ‘X’and variable ‘Y’. The variables of the study is the motivation (X) as the independent variable and student achievement (Y) as the dependent variable.
To measure the variables of this study used a questionnaire to the respondent based on the indicator predetermined. The population of this study were all students of Nursing Academy Dirgahayu registered at BAAK and be active in lecturing starts from class of 2009 to 2012. Of this population, taken as many as 157 respondents as sampling study. The data analysis technique used is the technique of descriptive statistical analysis and inferential analysis technique that aims to assess the research variables
The results showed that: (1) Student of Nursing Academy Dirgahayu at level 2 who have high creativity as much as 21.51%, high enough creativity 49.42%, less high creativity 25,58% and low creativity 3.49%. Thus the students of Nursing Academy Dirgahayu at level 2tends to be quite high creativity. (2) Student of Nursing Academy Dirgahayu at level 2 who have a visual learning style as much as 44.19%, kinesthetic learning style 24.42% and auditory learning styles 30.82%. (3) Student of Nursing Academy Dirgahayu at level 2 who have medical-surgical learning achievement as very competent 35.47%, quite competent 37.21%, a competent 18.60%, and less competent 8.72%. Thus the medical-surgical student learning achievement of Nursing Academy Dirgahayu at level 2 is competent enough. (4) There is a positive and significant relationship between creativity and learning styles with medical-surgical student learning achievement (correlation coefficient of 0.906 and the value of determination coefficient of 0.820), or variance of learning achievement in medical-surgical is 82% can be explained by creativityvariable and learning stylevariable. (5) There is a positive and significant relationship between creativity and academic achievement surgical medical students (a correlation coefficient of 0.900 and the value of determination coefficient of 0.809), or learning achievement in medical-surgical variance of 80.9% can be explained by the variable creativity. (6) There is a positive and significant relationship between learning styles and academic achievement surgical medical students (a correlation coefficient of 0.393 and the value of determination coefficient of 0.154), or learning achievement in medical-surgical variance of 15.4% can be explained by the creativity variable and learning stylesvariable. (7) There is no difference significantly between students who have a visual-auditory learning style, kinesthetic visual, and kinesthetic auditory learning achievement in surgical medical students.
Keywords
Full Text:
pdfReferences
Abu Muhammad Ibnu Abdullah. (2008). Prestasi Belajar. http://spesialis-torch.com/content/view/120/29/ diakses pada tanggal 12/12/08
Adi W. Gunawan. (2004). Born to be a Genius. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Anggun Prameswari. (2009). Bakat ma Kreatif?.
http://a1 1no4.wordpress.com/2009/10/1 1/kreatif-ma-bakat/ diakses pada tanggal 1/11/09 pukul 15.30.
Buchori Alma. (2007). Kewirausahaan. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
Clark, B. (1988). Growing Up Gifted 3thed. Ohio: Merrill Publishing Co.
Conny R. Semiawan. (1997). PerspektifPendidikan Anak Berbakat. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
Crowll, T.K. et. Al. (1997). Educational Psychology, Windows on Teaching. Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark Publisher.
Csikszentmihalyi, Mihally. (1996). Creativity, Flow and The Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New Yotk: harper Collins Publisher.
Dedi Supriyadi. (1997). Kreativitas, Kebudayaan, dan Perkembangan Iptek. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
DePorter, Bobbi & Hernacki, Mike. (2000). Quantum Learning. Edisi Revisi. Bandung: Kaifa.
Devi Ari Mariani. (2007). Peran Belajar Berdasarkan Regulasi Diri dan Gaya
Belajar terhadap Prestasi Belajar Medikal bedah Mahasiswa Sekolah Menengah Atas. Tesis. Yogyakarta: FP, UGM.
Diah Kertasiwi. (2009). Hubungan Antara Partisipasi dalam Kegiatan OSIS dan Kreativitas Mahasiswa dengan Prestasi Belajar Sosiologi di SMA Negeri 10 Yogyakarta. Skripsi. Yogyakarta: FISE, UNY.
Dina Maulida. (2008). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar (Visual, Auditorial, dan
Kinestetik) terhadap Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Kelas IPenjualan SMK Muhammadiyah 2 Malangpada Mata Pelajaran Kewirausahaan Tahun Ajaran 2007/2008. Skripsi. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.
Djemari Mardapi. (2008). Teknik Penyusunan Instrunen Tes dan Non Tes. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendekia.
Efi Nur Afiyah. (2005). Hubungan Antara Motivasi Berprestasi dan Kreativitas dengan Prestasi Belajar Akuntansi Keuanganpada mahasiswa Kelas II Program Keahlian Akuntansi SMKNegeri 1 Tempel Sleman Yogyakarta Tahun Ajaran 2004/2005. Skripsi. Yogyakarta: FIS, UNY.
Eni Handayani. (2001). Pengaruh Kreativitas dan Cara Belajar Mahasiswa terhadap Prestasi Belajar Medikal bedah Mahasiswa kelas III SLTP. Skripsi. Yogyakarta: FMIPA, UNY.
Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds, An Anatomy of Creativity. New York: Basic Books.
. (1999). Intelligence Reframed, Multiple Intellegences for the 21st
Century. New York: Basic Books.
Hamzah Uno, dkk. (2004). Landasan Pembelajaran. Gorontalo: Nurul Jannah.
Hartanti dan Arhartanto. (2003) Profil Gaya Belajar Mahamahasiswa Baru: Survei Berdasarkan metode Brbe dan Swassing’ Anima, Indonesian Psycgological journal Vol. 18, No. 3, pp 295-307.
Hurlock, Elizabeth B. (2002). Perkembangan AnakJilid 2 (Meitasari Tjandrasa. Terjemahan). Jakarta:Erlangga.
Ibnu hajar. 1999. Dasar-dasar Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif dalam Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
I Made Putrawan. 1990. Pengujian Hipotesis dalam Penelitian-penelitian Sosial. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Ismani, dkk. (2007). Pedoman Penulisan Tugas Akhir Jurusan Pendidikan Akuntasi. Yogyakarta: FISE UNY.
Mia Damiyanti. (2004). Kemampuan Memecahkan Masalah Material Kedokteran Gigi: Studi Korelasional antara Pengetahuan Awal, Berpikir Kreatif dan Konsep Diri Akademik dengan Kemampuan Memecahkan Masalah pada Mahamahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Indonesi, Jkarta (2002). Disertasi. Jakarta : Universitas Negeri Jakarta.
Moeljadi Pranata. (2002). Menyoal Kecocoktidakan Gaya Pembelajaran Desain. NIRMANA Vol. 4, No. 1, Januari 2002: Hal 13-23.
Mohammad Ali. (2005). Psikologi remaja. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Morris, Wayne. (2006). Creativity: Its Place In Education.
http://www.jpb.com/creative/Creativity in Education.pdf diakses pada tanggal 23/12/08 pukul 13.14.
Muhibbin Syah. (2006). Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Persada.
Naiman, Linda. (2006). What is Creativity?.
http://www.creativityatwork.com/articlesContent/whatis.htm. diakses pada tanggal 23/12/08 pukul 13.19.
Nana Syaodih Sukmadinata. (2003). Landasan Psikologi Proses Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nasution. (2008). Berbagai Pendekatan dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar. Cetakan ke-11. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Ngalim Purwanto M. (2003) Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Ratna Wilis Dahar. (1996). Teori-Teori Belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Riduwan & Engkos A.K. (2008). Cara Menggunakan dan Memakai Analisis Jalus (Path Analisis). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Rose, Colin & Malcolm J. Nicholl. (2002). Cara Belajar cepatAbadXXI. Bandung: Nuansa.
Saifuddin Azwar. (2003). Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Offset.
Siti Mustafidah. (2009). Pengaruh Gay a Belajar Mahasiswa dan Lingkungan Belajar Mahasiswa terhadap Prestasi Belajar Akuntasi Kelas XIIPS MA Ali Maksum Krapyak Yogyakarta Tahun Ajaran 2008/2009. Skipsi. Yogyakarta: FISE, UNY.
Slameto. (2003). Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Smith, Mark K. (2001): http://www.infed.org/biblio/learning-humanistic.htm
Strenberg, R.J and Lubart T.I. (1999). Handbook of Creativity. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Suharsimi Arikunto. (2000). Manajemen Penelitian. Rineka Cipta: Jakarta.
. (2002). Manajemen Penelitian. Rineka Cipta: Jakarta.
. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik.
Rineka Cipta: Jakarta.
Suryabrata S, (2002). Psikologi pendidikan. Jakarta: Fajar Interpratama Offset.
Tohirin. (2006). Psikologi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agam,a Islam. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Utami Munandar S.C. (1999). Kreativitas dan Keberbakatan. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
. (1999). Mengembangkan bakatdan kreativitas Anak
Sekolah. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Winkel, W.S. (1999). Psikologi Pengajaran. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Raja Grasindo Persada.
. (2005). Psikologi Pengajaran. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Raja Grasindo
Persada.
Zainal Arifin. (1999). Evaluasi Instruksional. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31293/ddk.v33i2.1700
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c)
Indexing: