SUATU TINJAUAN YURIDIS ALAT BUKTI PENGAKUAN DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PERDATA DALAM PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM
Abstract
Abstract
General arrangements concerning the burden of proof in the settlement of a civil case are essentially contained in the provisions of Article 163 HIR / 283 Rbg, which states: Whoever says has a right, or specifies an event to affirm his right, or denied the rights of others, then the person must prove his or her right or the event.
The development of jurisprudence shows, among other things, that recognition as a proof does not always have perfect evidentiary power. Therefore, to assess the strength of the proof is left to the judge's wisdom. This means that the role of acknowledgment as evidence in civil procedure law is highly dependent on their case.
This means that the law needs to tighten the rules of civil procedure law with the development of the community who want it because in civil procedure law, not only seek the formal truth merely, but must always try to find and find the material truth.
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Abdurrahman, Penggunaan Metode Penelitian Hukum dalam penulisan Skripsi, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Fakultas Hukum, Banjarmasin, 1998.
A.Pitlo, Hukum Pembuktian dan Daluarsa menurut BW Belanda, Intermasa, Jakarta, 1978.
H. Riduan Syahrani, Buku Materi Dasar Hukum Acara Perdata, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2004.
Hari Sasangka, Hukum Pembuktian dalam perkara perdata untuk Mahasiswa dan praktisi, Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2005.
O. Notohamidjojo, Demi Keadilan dan Kemanusiaan, Beberapa Bab dalam filsafat Hukum. BPK Gunung Mulia, Jakarta, 1975.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 DEDIKASI JURNAL MAHASISWA
Contact person :
Amin Slamet
Faculty of Law. 17 August 1945 University of Samarinda
Jl.Ir.H.Juanda, No.80. Samarinda. East Kalimantan. Indonesia
Email : journalofl@gmail.com
Telp: 0541-743390
Journal of Law is licensed below Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.