TANGGUNG JAWAB AHLI WARIS TERHADAP DEBITUR YANG MENINGGAL DAN DINYATAKAN PAILIT DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 37 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG KEPAILITAN DAN PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG
Abstract
ABSTRACT
One of the criteria for implementing agreements made by creditors and debtors is guarantees because this guarantee can give confidence to creditors that the debtor will repay the loan. But in general, what happens in the business world, debts and receivables between creditors and debtors do not always run smoothly as promised. The debtor who should have fulfilled the obligation to pay his debt or performance, because of something unable to fulfill the obligations or achievements that should have been received by the creditor from the debtor, then the right step to solve it is through bankruptcy legal instrument, containing a rule that can regulate the relationship of the parties. and also regarding rights and obligations. This type of research is normative juridical research, library research with the problem approach used in the writing of this thesis is a statute approach.
The results showed that the responsibility of the heirs to the debtor who died and was declared bankrupt, the heirs could choose one of 3 (three) attitudes, namely: accept as a whole, be inclusive of the heir's debt, accept on condition, the inheritance is received in detail, while the debt is the heir will be paid based on the property received by the heir, and refuse the heir does not want to know about the settlement of the inheritance. Protection of property belonging to an heir of a debtor who has died and is declared bankrupt, namely the bankrupt debtor who still has control and management rights over several items as stipulated in article 22 in conjunction with article 21 of the Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations, which excludes or separates the debtor's personal assets that are not related to the bankruptcy.
Keywords: Bankruptcy, Inheritance and Legal Protection
Full Text:
PDFReferences
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
A. BUKU BACAAN
Asri Wijayanti, 2009, Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Pasca Reformasi, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Jono, 2015, Hukum Kepailitan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Oemar Moechthar, 2017, Kedudukan Negara Sebagai Pengelola Warisan Atas Harta Peninggalan Tak Terurus Menurut Sistem Waris Burgerlijk Wetboek, Yuridika, Vol. 32, Surabaya.
R.Subekti, 1997, Pokok-pokok Hukum Perdata, Intermasa, Jakarta.
Sutan Remy Sjahdeini, 2009, Hukum Kepailitan Memahami Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan, cet. 3, Pustaka Utama Grafiti, Jakarta.
Wahyono Darmabrata, 2012, Hukum Perdata: Asas-Asas Hukum Waris, Rizkita Jaya, Jakarta.
B. SUMBER LAIN
Amira, Tinjauan Hukum kepailitan, digilib.unila.ac.id.
https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teori.
http://tesishukum.com/pengertian-perlindungan-hukum/.
M. Idris Ramulyo, 1982, “Suatu Perbandingan Antara Ajaran Sjafi’i Dan Wasiat Wajib di Mesir, Tentang Pembagian Harta Warisan ntuk Cucu Menurut Islam”. Majalah Hukum Dan Pembangunan No. 2 Thn. XII Maret 1982.
Wirjono Prodjodikoro, Hukum warisan di Indonesia, ‘S Gravenhage, Bandung: Vorkink Van Hoeve.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Law ( Jurnal Ilmu Hukum )
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Contact person :
Amin Slamet
Faculty of Law. 17 August 1945 University of Samarinda
Jl.Ir.H.Juanda, No.80. Samarinda. East Kalimantan. Indonesia
Email : journalofl@gmail.com
Telp: 0541-743390
Journal of Law is licensed below Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.