SIKAP PENEGAK HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 35 TAHUN 2009

Agung Asmara

Abstract


ABSTRACT


In the application of the cumulative punishment is divided into several phases: the prosecution, the decision stage and the stage of the enforcement or execution. In the lawsuit Narcotics stage, the public prosecutor must consider the criminal provisions in the specific article of the Narcotics Act has been violated. Since the cumulative criminal provisions in the Narcotics Act is not specified on replacement confinement criminal penalties which are related to the defendant and therefore wealth difficulties in terms of execution, the prosecutor in the prosecution case Narcotics also included on the fine substitute imprisonment. Whereas in the case of Narcotics verdict stage, the judge is bound to the indictment prosecutors, legal evidence in court and is tied to the criminal provisions of the Narcotics Act. As for the implementation phase of a court decision (execution), the implementation of the decision is divided into three, namely: the implementation (execution) imprisonment, execution (execution) criminal fines and implementation (execution) imprisonment for a fine substitute.

References


DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Andi Hamzah, Sistem Pidana dan Pemidanaan Indonesia, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta, 1993.

Andi Hamzah dan R.M. Surachman, Kejahatan Narkotika dan Psikotropika, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 1994.

Gatot Supramono, Hukum Narkoba Indonesia, Djambatan, Jakarta, 2001.

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Balai Pustaka, Jakarta, 1996.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)



Contact person :

Amin Slamet

Faculty of Law. 17 August 1945 University of Samarinda
Jl.Ir.H.Juanda, No.80. Samarinda. East Kalimantan. Indonesia

Email : journalofl@gmail.com

Telp: 0541-743390

Lisensi Creative Commons
Journal of Law is licensed below Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.