PENGARUH MOTIVASI KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA PEGAWAI PADA SEKRETARIAT DAERAH KABUPATEN KUTAI TIMUR

Krisnawati Wiji Rahayu

Abstract


Influence Motivation Work To Performance Officer at the Secretariat of the East Kutai Regency is the extent to which the work motivation affects employee performance and employee willingness to devote the skills, knowledge, skills, energy and time in which the work motivation expect compensation from the company that can satisfy their needs.

The formulation of the problem in this research is "Does Work Motivation significant effect on employee performance at the East Kutai Regency Secretariat?"

The purpose of this research is to know and analyze the working motivation influence on employee performance in the East Kutai Regency Secretariat.

The analysis tool in this research using descriptive analysis and simple linear regression analysis. In this study, the test is made freely (X = motivation) on the dependent variable (Y = performance of the employee). Testing the hypothesis can be stated as follows Ha: Motivation affect the performance of employees in the Secretariat of the East Kutai Regency, Ho: Motivation does not affect the performance of employees in the Secretariat of the East Kutai Regency, If: T hitung < T tabel then ho is received, the independent variable (motivation) is not effect on the dependent variable (employee performance) .T hitung > t tabel then ho is received, the independent variable (motivation) effect on the dependent variable (employee performance).

The results of this research through a simple linear regression analysis test is that the variable X is motivation positive effect on employee performance due to variables has more than t table t count ie 4113 and Ttabel is 1,995.

The hypothesis put forward in this study is that the motivational effect on the performance of employees in the Secretariat staff in the East Kutai Regency Thanks.

Keywords


Motivation, Performance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Buhler, Patricia. 2004. Alpa Teach Yourself. Management Skills dalam 24Jam. Terj. Jakarta: Prenada Media

Bernardin, H. John, danJoyce E.A Russel. (2003). Human resource management (An Experimental Approach International Editio). Mc. Graw -Hill Inc.Singapore

Handoko, T. H. 2001, Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi 2. BPFE, Yogjakarta

____________.2002, Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. BPFE, Yogjakarta

____________.2010, Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. BPFE, Yogjakarta

Hasibuan, Malayu. 2005. Organisasi dan Motivasi : dasar peningkatan produktivitas. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

________________.2000. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

________________. 2002. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

________________. 2008. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Mangkunegara, Anwar Prabu. 2001. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Bandung: Reflika Diatama.

Osborn, M.P. 1991. Breast Development and Anatomy. Dalam Harris, J.R. dkk penyunting). Breast Disease. 2nd edisi. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincot-Raven. p. 1-47.

Rivai, Veithzal. 2005. Performance Appraisal : Sistem yang Tepat Untuk Menilai Kinerja Pegawaidan Meningkatkan Daya Saing Perusahaan. Jakarta:PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sastrohadiwiryo, Siswanto. 2002. Manajemen Tenaga Kerja Indonesia Pendekatan Administratif dan Operasional. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara

Siagian, Sondang. 2002. Filsafat Administrasi. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta : PT. Bumi Aksara.

Simamora, Henry 2004, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara

Tika, Moh. Pabundu. (2006). Budaya Organisasi dan Peningkatan Kinerja Perusahaan. Jakarta : PT. Bumi Aksara.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31293/ekm.v6i1.2608

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.