PENGARUH PERSEPSI GAYA KEPEMIMPINAN TRANSFORMASIONAL TERHADAP DISIPLIN KERJA KARYAWAN DI PT BORNEO ALAM SEMESTA, DESA ADONG, MELAK, KUTAI BARAT, KALIMANTAN TIMUR
Abstract
Alfred Januar Kurniadi Ramli, NPM. 08.11.1001.3509.040, The Effect of The Perception of Transformational Leadership Style to The Labor Discipline of PT. Borneo Alam Semesta, Along Village, Melak, Kutai Barat, Kalimantan Timur. Industrial Psychology Department 17 Agustus 1945 University Samarinda, Undergraduate Thesis 2013.
The purpose of this research was to know the relationship between the Perception of Transformational Leadership Style to the Labor Discipline. As we know that there is a lot of problems in discipline which happened in many groups, so it will be needed a leader who can give an efforts to a better aim for those groups. The data which used by the researcher in this research comes from the book, journal, newspaper, an article, survey, an interview and electronic media.
The research were done with distributing a questionnaires which has 100 questions that made from the researcher itself. There are 122 respondents of the production employees (non-structural) and the overall of them is a man that comes from the company which active in the coal mining area, PT. Borneo Alam Semesta in Along village, Melak, Kutai Barat, Kalimantan Timur. The data analysis uses a statistic correlation product moment technique from Pearson, and also the statistic program SPSS 18 for windows.
The result of this research showed the hypotheses that submitted in this research was accepted, it means that there is a significant positive relationship between the Perception of Transformational Leadership Style to the Labor Discipline with correlation score 0,253. The higher of the Perception of Transformational Leadership style means that higher of Labor Discipline, vice versa, the lower of the Perception of Transformational Leadership style means that lower of Labor Discipline. As for the effective contribution of the Perception of Transformational Leadership Style to the Labor Discipline in PT. Borneo Alam Semesta is 6,4%.
Keywords
References
Ahmadi, A. 2002. Psikologi Sosial. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Amriany, F., dkk. 2004. Iklim Organisasi yang Kondusif Meningkatkan Kedisiplinan Kerja. Jurnal Psikologi, Vol.19, No.2, H.179-193. Surabaya: Fak. Psikologi Universitas Surabaya
Ancok, D., 2012. Psikologi Kepemimpinan & Inovasi: Modal Kepemimpinan. Jakarta : Erlangga.
Anoraga dan Suyati, S. 1995. Psikologi Industri dan Sosial. Jakarta: PT. Dunia Pustaka Jaya.
Anoraga, P. 1992. Psikologi Dalam Perusahaan. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Arikunto, Suharsini, 2007, Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Azwar, S., 2011. Metode Penelitian : Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.
Berry, Lily, M. 1998. Psychology at Work. San Fransisco: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Dessler. (2007). Managemen Sumber Daya Manusia (10th ed). New Jersey : Prantice Hall. Inc. Index
Doelhadi, A.S. (2001), Kerja dalam dimensi tinjauan psikologi, Insan, Media Psikologi, no. 1, vol. 3, hal. 27-40, Jakarta
Gibson, C.B. 2001. Me and Us. Journal of Organizational Behavior.
Gibson, Ivancevich, dan Donnelly, 1997. Organization, Behavior, Structure, processes”, 9th, Richard D. Irwin Inc.
Irwanto. 1997. Psikologi Umum. Jakarta: APTIK.
Hasibuan, Malayu S.P. 2003. Organisasi dan Motivasi. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
Kartono, K. 1992. Psikologi Sosial untuk Manajemen, Perusahaan dan Industri. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Kusriyanto, B. 1984. Organisasi Perusahaan. Jakarta: Pustaka Binaman.
Lateiner, F., Levine, J.E. 1983. Teknik Memimpin Pegawai dan Pekerja. Alih Bahasa: Imam Sudjoko. Jakarta: Cemerlang.
Levy, Paul E. 2003. Industrial/Orgabizational Psychology. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Luthans, Fred. 2006. Perilaku Organisasi. Yogyakarta : Andi.
Moekijat. 1991. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Manajemen Kepegawaian). Bandung : Mandar Maju.
Moekijat, 2005. Manajemen Kepegawaian. Bandung: Alumni.
Rivai, Veithzhal. 2005. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Perusahaan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Robbins, P. S. 1996. Perilaku Organisasi: Konsep, Kotroversi, Aplikasi Jilid 2. Jakarta : PT. Prenhallindo.
Robbins, S.P., 2006. Perilaku Organisasi:Karakteristik Pemimpin Transformasional. Jakarta : Perhallindo.
Sastrohadiwiryo, Bedjo Siswanto. 2002. Manajemen Tenaga Kerja Indonesia:Pendekatan Administratif dan Operasional. Jakarta Bumi: Aksara.
Siagian, Sondang P.Prof. Dr. MPA. 2004. Teori Motivasi dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Siagian, S. 2002. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
Tjipjono dan Syakhroza, A. 1999. "Kepemimpinan Transformasional", Manajemen dan Usahawan Indonesia, No. 9, Thn. XXVIII September 1999, hal. 5-13.
Tjiptono, F. 1999. Prinsip-Prinsip Total Quality Service. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Triantoro, Safaria. 2004. Kepemimpinan. Grahha Ilmu. Yogyakata.
Desianty, S., 2005. Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi Pada PT. POS Indonesia (PERSERO) Semarang. Jurnal Studi Manajemen & Organisasi : Semarang.
Hartini, N. 1999. Studi Hubungan antara Persepsi Bawahan Mengenai Kepemimpinan Atasan dengan Intensitas Komunikasi Bawahan Terhadap Atasan. Insan Journal: no.1, th.1.
Herminingsih, A., 2011. Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Transformasional Terhadap Budaya Organisasi. Jurnal Ilmiah : Jakarta.
Mutmainnah, S., 2005. Pengaruh Motivasi dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada PT. Panen Lestari Internusa Medan. Jurnal Plans : Medan.
Silalahi, Betty, Yuliani., 2008. Kepemimpinan Transformasional, Motivasi Kerja, Budaya Organisasi, dan Komitmen Organisasi. Jurnal Psikologi : Jawa Barat.
Wijaya, M., 2005. Kepemimpinan Transformasional di Sekolah dalam Meningkatkan Outcomes Peserta Didik.. Jurnal Pendidikan : Penabur.
.http://www.jpnn.com/read/2012/08/24/137522/Astaga,-436-PNS-di-Pemkot-Samarinda-Bolos-.Diakses tanggal 15 Januari 2013.
http://m.jpnn.com/news.php?id=146867. Diakses tanggal 15 Januari 2013.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.