Quality of Public Services

LCA Robin Jonathan

Abstract


Improving the quality of public services at the local level is very important, the community directly receives and feels the service provided by the local government. This research is to know and analyze the quality of public service at the Department of Manpower and Transmigration of East Kutai Regency. The population of this study are all consumers in East Kutai District who come to the Office of Manpower and Transmigration to obtain services. The assessment of the quality of public services consists of variables Realibility, Responsivenes, Assurance, Emphaty dan Tangibles menggunakan skala Likert; Metode Importance and Performance Analysis (IPA) to compare the gap between appraisal and community expectations; And Cartesian Diagram. The conclusions of the study are: (1) There are 10 sub variables in quadrant B, indicating the consumer is satisfied with the service; (2) There are 3 sub-variables in quadrant A, indicating consumer not yet satisfied at service performance; (3) There are 2 sub variables in quadrant C, indicating consumer not satisfied with importance and service performance; (4) There are 4 sub-variables in quadrant D, indicating consumer satisfaction at service performance; (5) The average value of Service Performance that has been received by consumers is smaller than the value of service expectation. This means that the services provided by the Disnakertrans have not provided satisfaction for consumers and therefore need to improve their performance.


Keywords


Effectiveness, quality of public services, SERVQUAL instrument

Full Text:

DOC PDF

References


Anonim. 2003. Ketetapan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Nomor 63 /KEP/M.PAN/7/2003 Tentang Pedoman Umum Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Publik.

Bambang Sancoko. 2010. Pengaruh Remunerasi Terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Publik, Bisnis & Birokrasi, Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Dan Organisasi, Hlm.43-51, Volume 17, Nomor 1, Issn 0854-3844, Jan–Apr 2010.

Dwiyanto, Agus, Dkk. 2006. Reformasi Birokrasi Publik di Indonesia, Pusat Studi Kependudukan Dan Kebijakan, Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Fandy, Tjiptono. 2005. Manajemen Pemasaran Jasa. Edisi Pertama.Yogyakarta. Pt. Andi.

Husain Umar. 2002. Riset Pemasaran Dan Perilaku Konsumen. Cetakan Kedua. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta.

M Engka - Governance, 2013. Kualitas Pelayanan Publik Aparatur Pemerintah Kecamatan Langowan Timur Kabupaten Minahasa. Ejournal.Unsrat.ac.id

Parasuraman, A, Berry, L.L, Zeithaml, V.A. 1990. Refinement and Reassessment of The Servqual Scale. Journal of Retailing, Vol. 67 No.4.

Saragih, Ferdinand D. 2006. Menciptakan Pelayanan Publik Yang Prima Melalui Metode Benchmarking Praktis. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Dan Organisasi, Bisnis & Birokrasi, Vol.14, No.3. September.

Suprijadi, Anwar. 2004. Kebijakan Peningkatan Kompetensi Aparatur Pelayanan Publik. Lembaga Administrasi Negara RI (LANRI). Jakarta.

Wahyu Kuncoro, 2006, Studi Evaluasi Pelayanan Publik Dan Kualitas Pelayanan Di Rumah Sakit Umum Dr. Soetomo, Tesis, Magister Ilmu Politik Pada Program Pascasarjana Universitas Diponegoro.

Zeithaml, Valerie A, A. Parasuraman And Leonard L. Berry. 1990. Delivering Quality Service, Balancing Customer Perception, and Expectations. USA: The Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31293/rjabm.v1i1.2724

Refbacks



Copyright (c) 2017 Research Journal of Accounting and Business Management



 

 

 

Creative Commons Licensesitus web mitra usaha tani