Evaluation of the Implementation of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) at the Disability Exhibition

Eva Meizara Puspita Dewi; Novita Maulidya Jalal; Eka Damayanti

doi:10.31293/mv.v9i1.9281

Evaluation of the Implementation of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) at the Disability Exhibition

Eva Meizara Puspita Dewi, Novita Maulidya Jalal, Eka Damayanti

Abstract

Universal Design for Learning (UDL) is a pedagogical framework aimed at ensuring equitable access to learning; however, its application in nonformal public learning events, such as exhibitions in Indonesian higher education, remains limited. This study employed a descriptive qualitative design to evaluate the implementation of UDL principles in a photovoice exhibition involving students with disabilities, guided by the UDL Guidelines 3.0. Data were collected from 27 respondents, including participants with disabilities, visitors (students, lecturers, and disability communities), and were complemented by organizers’ observational notes. Data analysis involved coding participant feedback, mapping findings onto the three core UDL principles (engagement, representation, and action and expression), and identifying accessibility gaps. The findings indicate that while the exhibition fostered a warm atmosphere and incorporated visual–narrative multimodality, significant barriers persisted. In terms of engagement, challenges included overcrowded space, inadequate acoustics, and speaking pace misaligned with sign language interpretation. Regarding representation, accessibility was constrained by small text size, limited audio descriptions, and unclear panel sequencing. For action and expression, cross-disability interaction remained limited due to the placement of assistants outside the main room and mobility barriers. These results suggest that UDL implementation in exhibition settings remains partial, highlighting the need for more inclusive public event design through user-centered planning and comprehensive integration of UDL principles. This study implies that the implementation of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) in public exhibitions requires more systematic accessibility planning, including accessible communication, spatial design, and cross-disability participation support to ensure equitable learning experiences for individuals with diverse disabilities.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Braden, C. (2016). Museums, accessibility, and visitors with disabilities. University of Michigan. https://ummsp.rackham.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Braden-working-paper-FINAL-pdf.pdf

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bray, A., Devitt, A., Banks, J., Sanchez Fuentes, S., Sandoval, M., Riviou, K., Byrne, D., Flood, M., Reale, J., & Terrenzio, S. (2024). What next for Universal Design for Learning? A systematic literature review of technology in UDL implementations at second level. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(1), 113-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13328

Capp, M. J. (2017). The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A meta-analysis of literature between 2013 and 2016. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(8), 791–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1325074

CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. CAST. https://udlguidelines.cast.org/

CAST. (2024). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 3.0. Author. https://udlguidelines.cast.org

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications

Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (5th ed.). Routledge

Espada-Chavarria, R., González-Montesino, R. H., López-Bastías, J. L., & Díaz-Vega, M. (2023). Universal Design for Learning and Instruction: Effective Strategies for Inclusive Higher Education. Education Sciences, 13(6), 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060620

Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2016). The museum experience revisited. Routledge.

Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. Basic Book

Griful-Freixenet, J., Struyven, K., Verstichele, M., & Andries, C. (2017). Higher education students with disabilities speaking out: Perceived barriers and opportunities of the universal design for learning framework. Disability & Society, 32(10), 1627-1649. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1365695

Healy, R., Banks, J., & Ryder, D. (2023). Universal design for learning policy in tertiary education in Ireland: Are we ready to commit?. In Handbook of higher education and disability (pp. 377-391). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802204056.00041

Insulander, E. (2008). The exhibition as a multimodal pedagogical text. In Making museums matter (pp. 127–136). Linköping University Electronic Press. https://ep.liu.se/ecp/022/011/ecp072211.pdf

James, W., Lamons, K., Spilka, R., Bustamante, C., Scanlon, E., & Chini, J. J. (2019). Hidden walls: STEM course barriers identified by students with disabilities. In 2019 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings (pp. 228–233). American Association of Physics Teachers. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2019.pr.James

Johnson, K. R., Blaskowitz, M. G., & Mahoney, W. J. (2023). Technology for adults with intellectual disability: secondary analysis of a scoping review. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 90(4), 395-404. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841742311609

Kasemsarn, K., & Nickpour, F. (2025). Museum Presentations for Older Adults: A Review of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Integration with Digital Storytelling (DST) Guidelines. Heritage, 8(6), 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage8060189

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

Majewski, J. (1996). Smithsonian guidelines for accessible exhibition design. Smithsonian Accessibility Program, 1-60.

Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal Design for Learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1971149384748237586

Novembli, M. S., Hasanah, N., & Fitriani, D. (2024). Investigating the impact of Universal Design for Learning: Empowering students with disabilities in higher education. E3S Web of Conferences, 593, 04004. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202459304004

Rao, K., Ok, M. W., & Bryant, B. R. (2014). A review of research on universal design educational models. Remedial and special education, 35(3), 153-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513518980

Rao, K., & Meo, G. (2016). Using universal design for learning to design standards-based lessons. SAGE Open, 6(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016680688

Rappolt‐Schlichtmann, G., & Daley, S. G. (2013). Providing access to engagement in learning: The potential of Universal Design for Learning in museum design. Curator: The Museum Journal, 56(3), 307-321. https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12030

Slattery, D. M., O’Shaughnessy, T., O'Dwyer, S., & Beeley, J. (2026). Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze? Academic Perspectives of Inclusive Practice and Universal Design for Learning (UDL). The International Journal of Universal Design and Universal Design for Learning, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.34874/PRSM.ijududl-vol1iss2.6988

Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819702400309

Williamson, H. J., van Heumen, L., & Schwartz, A. E. (2020). Photovoice with individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities: lessons learned from inclusive research efforts. Collaborations: A Journal of Community-Based Research and Practice, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.33596/coll.45

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31293/mv.v9i1.9281